"Lab day," Comet says, setting cones along the park loop at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 strides.
"Walk from the start to each cone," Wren says. "I time it. One pair of numbers per cone."
Comet walks to the first cone. "4 seconds," Wren calls. She walks to the second. "8."
Six cones, six times. Nova plots them as Wren reads. "30 strides, 22 seconds. Would you like a hint? Look at the shape."
"Almost a perfect line," Comet says. "Steady walking makes a steady slope. What do you notice, Wren?"
"The slope is about 0.7 seconds per stride," he says. "And the intercept is near zero, which makes sense."
"Zero strides, zero seconds," Comet says. "The intercept has a meaning here. It did not on the practice chart."
Here are the crew's own six timings from Nova's Run Log. Yours will differ, and that is the point.
| Cone | Strides | Seconds |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 4 |
| 2 | 10 | 8 |
| 3 | 15 | 11 |
| 4 | 20 | 15 |
| 5 | 25 | 19 |
| 6 | 30 | 22 |
The crew's line is seconds = 0.73 × strides + 0.47. The slope says each stride takes about 0.7 seconds.
The intercept 0.47 is close to zero. At zero strides, no time has passed, so a small intercept makes sense.
| Statement | True or false? |
|---|---|
| Steady walking gives a scatter plot with a nearly straight line. | ? |
| In the stride timing, the intercept should be far from zero. | ? |
| 22 - 4 = 18 | ? |
| Your lab line should match the crew's exactly. | ? |
Good lab work. Tomorrow you see why squares are the right gaps to add, and a residual plot judges the fit.