"Two sets from the log," Wren says, pinning up two dot plots. "Set A has a far value on the right."
"Set B has one on the left," Comet says. "31, way below the rest. What do you notice?"
"Set A: mean 48.1, median 47. Set B: mean 44.5, median 46," Wren reads. "Pulled in opposite directions."
Nova lights the two medians. "Would you like a hint? Ask what the median actually looks at."
"Only the middle position," Comet says. "Slide the far value anywhere past the others and the middle never changes."
"That is the proof," Wren says. "And it tells us something else. A set with an outlier is not bell-shaped."
"So no normal model for sets A and B," Comet says. "Only the stretch holds earned the bell."
| Set | Mean | Median | Fences | Outlier | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 48.1 | 47 | 39 and 55 | 62 | skewed right |
| B | 44.5 | 46 | 39.5 and 51.5 | 31 | skewed left |
A high outlier pulls the mean up and makes the set skewed right. A low outlier pulls the mean down and makes it skewed left.
Either way the median sits with the bulk of the data, and that is where the typical value really is.
The normal model is a bell: one peak, symmetric, with thin tails and no outlier. Fit it only to data shaped like that.
A skewed set, a set with an outlier, or a set with two peaks gives wrong percentages when forced into a bell.
Check the shape first with a dot plot or histogram. The stretch holds pass. Sets A and B do not.
Careful proving. Tomorrow you put outliers and the bell to work in everyday readings around the loop.