Wren lays two braces on the bench. "I measured three parts of each and they match. Are the braces congruent?"
"Which three?" Comet asks. "Three sides, I believe. Three angles, I do not."
"Two sides and the angle between them," Wren says. "What do you notice if I line up that angle?"
Comet slides one brace so the matching corners meet, then turns it so one side lies along the other.
"The angle fixes the direction of the second side. The length fixes where it ends. The third corner is forced."
Nova projects the third sides. They lie exactly on each other. "Would you like a hint? That is SAS."
"Side, angle, side. One sequence, no guessing," Wren says. "Our designer, find the motion for each case."
| Criterion | Matching parts, in order around the triangle | Why it forces congruence |
|---|---|---|
| SSS | three sides | three set lengths can close in only one shape |
| SAS | two sides and the angle between them | the angle sets the direction, the lengths set the endpoints |
| ASA | two angles and the side between them | the side sets two corners, the angles set the two rays that meet at the third |
Each criterion names a sequence of rigid motions that must land one triangle on the other.
AAS also works, because the third angle is forced once two are known. Then it is ASA in disguise.
Notice what SAS used: a translation, a rotation and maybe a reflection. Nothing else was needed.
ASA runs the same way. After the side lines up, the two equal angles aim two rays that can meet at only one point.
To show two braces are congruent, name the whole sequence of motions, or match three parts with SSS, SAS or ASA.
The sequence is the definition. The criterion is the shortcut. The shortcut works only because the sequence always exists.
Excellent reasoning. Tomorrow is Shop Lab: cardboard strips and paper fasteners test every criterion.