Two letters lie side by side on the Signal Desk, both about the same question.
"Should The Signal come out twice a week?" Rocket reads. "Letter A says no. Letter B says yes. I want yes."
"Wanting is not weighing," Raven says. "Read B's second sentence. What do you notice?"
"One neighbor asked when the next issue was coming, so the whole neighborhood wants more." Rocket stops. "One neighbor. Whole neighborhood."
"A leap," Raven says. "The step does not follow."
Nova hovers between the two letters. "Sound reasoning walks," she says. "Each step touches the ground. Watch for the jump."
Rocket sighs and picks up Letter A.
Reasoning is sound when each step follows from the one before. A leap is a step that does not follow, such as one person wants it, so everyone does.
Evidence is sufficient when there is enough of it to hold the claim. One example is rarely enough. A count, a survey and an example together are stronger.
Raven thinks aloud: "Letter A says fourteen neighbors on the porch survey preferred one careful issue. Fourteen is more than one, and a survey is a count. That is closer to sufficient."
Common leaps to watch for: one case stands for all, all or nothing, and more is always better.
Both letters ran in this week's Signal, side by side.
| Sound or a leap? | True or false? |
|---|---|
| "One neighbor asked, so the whole neighborhood wants more" is sound reasoning. | ? |
| "Reading aloud catches mistakes, and a second issue would shrink that step" follows step by step. | ? |
| "More news is always better" is supported by evidence in Letter B. | ? |
| Letter A gives more evidence than Letter B. | ? |
| Walking the neighborhood every day proves that writing twice as much is easy. | ? |
Sound steps, enough weight. Tomorrow Nova reviews all four arguments from this week's Signal.