← Back to course
AI Explorers 6-8 / Week 12 / Wednesday
3/6
Week 12 Β· The AI Review Board

Wednesday

Explorer Lab: Review Sky Sorter
// Review, refine and present
⏱ about 20 min

Wednesday: Explorer Lab: Review Sky Sorter

The review board spreads out twenty fresh snapshot cards. Sky Sorter has never seen any of them.

"This is the final review test," Raven says. "We count, we score, we write feedback."

Rocket deals out the cards. "And if Sky Sorter does badly?"

Nova hovers over the scorecard. "Then the board writes down exactly what to fix," she says.

"A review is not about passing or failing. It is about making the next version better."

Rocket picks up the first card, a dim, fuzzy smudge. "Here we go," he says.

What you need

  • Paper and a pencil
  • The seven characteristics table from Monday
  • Your Sky Sorter notes from earlier weeks, if you kept them
  • A partner to act as a second board member, if you can
Safety first
This review is on paper only. No apps, websites or AI tools.

The review test results

Here are the board's results on 20 new cards. These numbers are for this review only.

LabelCards in testSorted right
Star55
Planet55
Comet52
Satellite streak54
Total20?
How many of the 20 cards did Sky Sorter sort right?
How many did it get wrong?
What percent is 16 out of 20?
READ THE RESULTS
  • Read the question.
  • Tap your answer.
Which label did Sky Sorter struggle with most?
All 3 missed comets were dim. Which characteristic does that raise questions about?
What is the best feedback from the board?

Fill in the scorecard

  1. Copy the seven characteristics onto paper as a table with three columns.
  2. Title the columns: Characteristic, Evidence, Strong or needs work.
  3. For each row, write one piece of evidence from Sky Sorter's story.
  4. Mark each row strong or needs work.
  5. Write the top two pieces of feedback at the bottom.
  6. If you have a partner, compare scorecards. Where did you disagree?
CharacteristicEvidenceStrong or needs work
Valid and reliable16 of 20 right
Fair, with harmful bias managedComets: 2 of 5 right, all 3 misses dim
Explainable and interpretableDecision tree path can be followed
Privacy-enhancedNames and locations removed
Board ideaTrue or false?
A review test should use cards the system has never seen.?
A review is only about passing or failing.?
Feedback should say exactly what to fix.?
If overall accuracy is high, the board can skip checking each label.?
WHY THIS EXERCISEOverall accuracy can hide a weak spot, like the dim comets, so the board checks each label.

A thorough review. Tomorrow you use the feedback to write Sky Sorter's design brief.

← Tuesday