On Sunday night, Maya types three words into a chatbot: "Make a meal plan."
The answer is long and cheerful. It lists seven dinners, and most of them take over an hour to make.
Two use foods her kids will not touch. None of it fits a weeknight in her house.
Maya sighs. "That is my fault," she says. "I did not tell it anything."
In week 1 you learned that text tools work by predicting the next likely word.
When a request is vague, the tool fills the gaps with whatever fits its patterns. Those patterns are not your family, class or shop.
NIST also notes that generated content may not say when it is unsure. So a vague answer can still sound certain.
This course suggests a simple habit for any request. Before you type, answer four questions.
| Part | The question it answers | Maya's answer |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | What do I want done? | Plan five weeknight dinners. |
| Audience | Who is it for? | Two adults and two kids, ages 7 and 10. |
| Format | What shape should it take? | A table with the day, the dinner and a shopping list. |
| Limits | What must it stay within or avoid? | Thirty minutes or less. Use rice, beans, chicken, carrots, apples and oats. |
Notice what Maya left out. She gave ages, not names. She did not mention her kids' school or health details.
NIST lists leaks of health and other personal information as a privacy risk of generative AI. Week 3's never-paste list still applies.
| Statement | True or false? |
|---|---|
| A vague request leaves the tool to fill gaps from its patterns. | ? |
| The four-part habit is proven to work every time. | ? |
| Giving ages instead of names keeps a request more private. | ? |
| A clear request means you no longer need to check the output. | ? |
Sources: NIST AI 600-1, Generative AI Profile (2024)
Tomorrow: the check list, and a quiz draft with problems to find.